ASOPROFESSIONALLET’S TALK ↗

THE ASO PROFESSIONAL FIELD GUIDE / ASO competitor keyword research

STUDY THE MARKET.
KEEP YOUR OWN BRAIN.

Competitors can reveal useful language and expectations. They cannot tell you what your product should become, and their visible listing does not expose their complete strategy.

GET INTO THE DETAIL ↓
Gabriel working on aso competitor keyword research at his ASO workspace
GABRIEL MACHURET / ASO IN PRACTICE

MAKE THE THINKING VISIBLE

Observe first. Interpret second.

Swipe horizontally to compare all columns →

Illustrative editorial review
Fictional alternativeVisible positioningWhat remains unknown
Receipt-focused appCapture and organise receiptsIts conversion rate and keyword revenue
Accounting suiteA broader finance workflowWhich acquisition terms drive valuable users
Expense-report toolSubmit and review expensesThe contribution of each listing element

Fictional examples and editorial frameworks. No live keyword data, client result or ranking forecast is shown.

01

Choose competitors by the job they compete for.

A product in the same category is not always the closest alternative for a specific need. Identify apps that satisfy the task you are investigating, then note important differences in audience, scope and business model.

A specialist receipt scanner and a broad accounting suite can overlap without being equivalent. Use intent to explain why each competitor belongs in the comparison.

02

Record what is visible and what is inferred.

Capture the relevant store, market, date and listing language. Label observations separately from interpretations. A term in a subtitle is visible evidence; a claim about the competitor’s revenue from that term is not supported by the subtitle.

Tool-derived keyword estimates need their own source and definition. Do not present them as internal account data you have not seen.

03

Look for positioning patterns and omissions.

Compare the main promise, audience cues and screenshot evidence. Several competitors emphasising a similar job can suggest an expectation worth investigating. It does not prove that copying their wording will improve your performance.

The comparison matrix is fictional and illustrates the method. Use gap analysis to separate a potential opportunity from a simple difference between lists.

04

Avoid importing claims or brand terms.

A competitor’s product may support capabilities yours does not. Their trademark is not a generic description of your app. Apple’s search guidance explicitly identifies competing app names among inappropriate keyword choices.

Use the research to understand the market and your own positioning. Check the applicable store rules before turning a candidate into published metadata.

05

Bring the findings back to your product.

For each useful observation, write the implication for your app and the evidence needed to act. That might be a clearer description of an existing workflow, a research question or a decision to ignore an irrelevant topic.

The output should support prioritisation, not mimic a rival’s entire listing. For a scoped investigation and handoff, see keyword research services.

CLEAR UP THE DETAILS

Common questions.

Can public listings reveal a competitor’s conversion rate?

No. Do not infer private performance metrics from visible copy or screenshots alone.

Should I copy the highest-ranked app?

No. Investigate its relevance and positioning, then make decisions based on your own product and evidence.

How many competitors should I review?

Enough to understand the relevant alternatives and patterns. Select them for a reason rather than reaching an arbitrary count.

FOLLOW THE NEXT QUESTION

Keep learning.

PUT IT TO WORK ON YOUR APP

Want a second pair
of experienced eyes?

Explore the scope, deliverables and process before starting a conversation.

KEYWORD RESEARCH SERVICES ↗

ORIGINAL ASO RESEARCH

Test the assumptions.

Explore twenty studies of app charts, ratings, reviews and local markets, including results that challenged the original theory.

Explore the ASO experiments ↗