ASOPROFESSIONALLET’S TALK ↗

THE ASO PROFESSIONAL FIELD GUIDE / ASO consultant vs agency

THE LABEL IS EASY.
CHECK THE DELIVERY.

Compare an ASO consultant and agency by the people doing the work, production coverage and decision ownership—not assumptions about size.

GET INTO THE DETAIL ↓
Gabriel Machuret reviewing an ASO consulting brief and app strategy
GABRIEL MACHURET / ASO IN PRACTICE

MAKE THE THINKING VISIBLE

Compare the proposal, not the stereotype.

Swipe horizontally to compare all columns →

Illustrative editorial review
DecisionAsk either provider
Senior involvementWho researches, reviews and presents?
Production coverageWhich design and language tasks are included?
ContinuityWho handles absence or a team change?
CommunicationWho owns the recommendation and next action?

Editorial evaluation framework, not a provider ranking, fee quote or guarantee of results.

01

Define the capability you need.

A team needing senior diagnosis has a different brief from a team needing research, design, translation and publishing capacity. List the work before choosing the provider category. Otherwise a comparison can reward services you will never use.

Use a shared brief to state the problem and implementation capacity. The right arrangement depends on the actual engagement, not whether a website says consultant or agency.

02

Inspect named involvement.

Ask who researches, recommends, reviews and presents. A consultant may work with specialists; an agency may offer direct senior involvement. Neither arrangement should be inferred from the label alone.

Request a delivery map and clarify substitution arrangements. If you are hiring a particular expert, the agreed scope should describe their role rather than leaving it as an impression from the sales conversation.

03

Separate strategy from production.

Research and recommendations can be excellent while your team still lacks the people to implement them. Conversely, a production-heavy package may not answer an unresolved strategic question. Identify which capability is missing.

Compare service scopes and ask whether design, translation, publishing and testing support are included. Avoid counting a brief as finished production unless that is the agreed output.

04

Compare communication and accountability.

Ask how decisions are recorded, how disagreements are resolved and who owns the final recommendation. More participants can add expertise and also require coordination. A smaller arrangement still needs continuity and clear responsibilities.

Use proposal checks to evaluate the actual workflow. Do not assume responsiveness, quality or cost from headcount alone.

05

Choose against the brief.

Compare evidence of fit, scope, personnel and your own implementation burden. Document the trade-off you are accepting rather than searching for a universal winner.

Gabriel’s consulting page describes his own offering. This comparison is published by a consultant; assess the proposal and delivery details directly rather than treating it as an independent provider ranking.

CLEAR UP THE DETAILS

Common questions.

Is a consultant always cheaper?

No. Compare actual fees, scope and responsibilities rather than assuming a price relationship.

Does an agency always include production?

No. Design, translation and publishing need to be stated explicitly.

Can a hybrid arrangement work?

Yes, if strategy, production, review and publishing responsibilities are clear.

FOLLOW THE NEXT QUESTION

Keep learning.

PUT IT TO WORK ON YOUR APP

Want a second pair
of experienced eyes?

Explore the scope, deliverables and process before starting a conversation.

WORK DIRECTLY WITH GABRIEL ↗